Differences in Fy 1998 Formulation and Execution Data

By Government Printing Office

Book Id: WPLBN0000077693
Format Type: PDF eBook:
File Size: 0.4 MB
Reproduction Date: 2005

Title:	Differences in Fy 1998 Formulation and Execution Data
Author:	Government Printing Office
Volume:
Language:	English
Subject:	Government publications, Legislation., Economic & political studies
Collections:	Government Library Collection, Government Printing Office
Historic Publication Date:
Publisher:	Government Printing Office


Citation APA MLA Chicago Printing Office, B. G. (n.d.). Differences in Fy 1998 Formulation and Execution Data. Retrieved from http://gutenberg.cc/

Description
Government Reference Publication

Excerpt
Excerpt: DIFFERENCES IN FY 1998 FORMULATION AND EXECUTION DATA Narrative Explanation This volume shows the differences between FY 1998 budget formulation and execution data. Budget formulation data are published in the prior year column of the Program & Financing (P&F) schedule in the President’s FY 2000 Budget. FY 1998 year-end budget execution data are reported on the SF 133 Report on Budget Execution. Formulation and execution data need to be correct because decision-makers use both sets of data to understand the financial status of Federal programs and to make future funding decisions. If they do not agree, this means that at least one set of data has errors - and possibly both sets of data. There are a number of reasons why formulation and execution data may differ: Ë Agencies submit these data using different computer systems. Formulation data is submitted via OMB’s MAX A-11 data entry system, while execution data is submitted to OMB via the Department of the Treasury Financial Management Service’s (FMS) GOALS data entry system. Ë Agencies submit these data at different times. Formulation data is submitted from November through January, while year-end execution data is submitted in November. Flaws that existed in the SF 133 reports may have been corrected by the time the Budget data submissions were completed. Ë Formulation and execution data are often submitted by different organizational units within a given agency. Different staff reporting the SF 133s and the P&F data may not have adequately communicated with one another. Ë Formulation data is collected for more than 1, 000 formulation accounts that are published in the Budget, while more than 5, 000 accounts are involved in executing the budget. The linkage between the formulation account and the execution account(s) may not have been properly in place.

Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page NARRATIVE Narrative Explanation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 TABLES Analysis of Obligations, Balances and Net Outlays Summary tables of Differences by Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Accounts in President’s Budget without SF 133 reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Differences in the President’s Budget and SF 133 reports by Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 TABLES BY AGENCY AND ACCOUNT Department of Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Department of Commerce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Department of Defense--Military . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Department of Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 Department of Health and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Department of Housing and Urban Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 Department of the Interior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 Department of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 Department of Labor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Department of State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Department of Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 Department of the Treasury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Department of Veterans Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 Environmental Protection Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 Office of Personnel Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 Small Business Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 Social Security Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142